ReBlogging ‘Will Smith Slapsgiving Chris Rock’ – Link Below

I rarely watch the Oscars unless there’s a movie or actor I deem serious enough to warrant my time is being nominated and that’s rare. Another reason I haven’t watched it in years is because I haven’t been to the movies in years. Several readers asked me did I agree with what Mr. Smith did […]

Will Smith Slapsgiving Chris Rock

About Yernasia Quorelios

Writer, Philosopher, Pseudo Psyche, Ascension Assistant, WordSmith, Reader
This entry was posted in Relationship Insights. Bookmark the permalink.

22 Responses to ReBlogging ‘Will Smith Slapsgiving Chris Rock’ – Link Below

  1. Dream says:

    I was reading a book about gender violence and mimetic behavior. It’s fascinating.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yernasia Quorelios says:

      ❤️ They ARE Gay; or Bi

      …💛💚💙…

      Liked by 1 person

      • Dream says:

        Chris and Will? I believe heterosexual.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Yernasia Quorelios says:

          💜 In The Closet maybe because, if Heterosexual, it would have been a PUNCH!!! it would have been a Punch and a Bloodied Nose; apparently Will and Jade have an Open Relationship, maybe Chris is One of Wills Male Lovers or maybe They Were Just Performing for The Cameras as that is Their Day Job, AM I Wrong or AM I Right 🤔 ?

          …💛💚💙…

          Like

      • Dream says:

        Gender abuse is violence, one gender to another. Not sexually or identity. Man vs woman or viceversa. Cheers and best wishes.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Yernasia Quorelios says:

          💎 – Diamond Hard – 💎

          💎 I Totally Agree and THANK YOU!!! Very Much; on a Final Note A BitchSlap is a BitchSlap (Nothing as Good as a Bitch Fight) except Real Girls who PUNCH!!! My Fucking Lights Out after I Say “YOU!!! Punch like a Girl.” that’s why I AM Single and Masturbating, OUCH!!!

          💎 – Diamond Hard – 💎

          Liked by 1 person

      • Dream says:

        Homosexuals, heterosexuals, and bisexuals are action-defined terms used to define the engagement with partners of the same-sex or different-sex or both sexes, not necessarily simultaneously. Gay and straight are lifestyles where sexual identity is present in day-to-day life, such as single or married.

        Liked by 1 person

        • Yernasia Quorelios says:

          💜 Nature or Nurture 🤔 ?

          …💛💚💙…

          Liked by 1 person

          • Dream says:

            Both, and some, nothing is only one thing as we keep discovering. First, it was fire, water, air, and dirt, then pudding with raisins, and last, a mini solar system. They are wave functions and probabilities, no longer particles or mini atoms.

            Liked by 1 person

          • Dream says:

            Not even the number one is one thing. It is the (1)multiplicative identity, (2)the unit designator, (3)singular, and the (4)first of the natural numbers and thus the indicator of the (5) first inline. It is five things.

            Liked by 1 person

          • Dream says:

            Ah, and in binary, yes and on. Seven things so far.

            Liked by 1 person

            • Yernasia Quorelios says:

              💜 Didn’t even mention trinary; 0=Off, 1=On, 2=WTF (What The Fuck), basically Quantum for Idiots

              …💛💚💙..

              Liked by 1 person

            • Yernasia Quorelios says:

              💜 Especially Intellectual Idiots who THINK!!! They Know It ALL; so THINK!!! Carefully about YOUR!!! Next ‘UnPleasant” Experience and WHY!!! it happened

              …💛💚💙…

              Liked by 1 person

              • Dream says:

                Hello there. I wondered how to ask what book you would like to know about, and I was thinking of giving you three choices, but after reading your response, I’m going to try number one, but it’s dry. So three is the most interesting, and two elaborates on a bunch of fascinating stuff and a chapter on Virginia Woolf.

                1) Ordinary Unhappiness: The Therapeutic Fiction of David Foster Wallace (Square One: First-Order Questions in the Humanities)
                by Jon Baskin.

                2) “Inclinations: A Critique of Rectitude (Square One: First-Order Questions in the Humanities)” by Adriana Cavarero, Adam Sitze, Amanda Minervini.

                3) “Love As Human Freedom (Square One: First-Order Questions in the Humanities)” by Paul A. Kottman.

                I can’t flip a coin, so what do you think?

                Liked by 1 person

              • Dream says:

                New reproductive technologies, along with new kinship formations, make the propagation of life and the raising of children seem less and less the result of sexual reproduction. At the same time, in many places, we are living through one of the most profound social transformations in human history: the erosion of a gender-based division of labor. The tidal waves of political and philosophical feminism, and the critiques to which entrenched institutions of sexual domination are subjected, are being felt throughout society.

                https://a.co/7pnUQ5o

                Liked by 1 person

      • mosckerr says:

        Howdy. WordPress continues to prevent me from giving a like. Have greatly reduced communications on my blog @ wordpress. But here’s my latest that i thought to share with you.

        The third Parshah of ויקרא, Parshat שמיני 

        This Parshah opens with the 2nd sugia and therefore continues the subject of the concluding sugia of Parshat צו, the k’vanna of the anointing of the House of Aaron as Moshiach.  This second sugia begins ט:א – י: ז.  This Parshah contains 4 chapters.   When the prophet Shmuel anointed Shaul as king, rain fell during the dry season – not a good sign.  

        The reason, farmers leave their cut hay out in the fields.  Unexpected rainfall causes this baled hay to rot.  Consequently rainfall during the dry season qualifies as a curse, similar to locusts which consume the crops growing in the fields.   Hence ט:ו states: וירא אליכם כבוד.  Targum Uziel interprets this to mean that HaShem shall אעברו ית יצרא בישא מן לבכון… diminish the Evil Inclination within your heart. 

        An action has an equal and opposite reaction.   The language וירא implies fear.   Nothing corrupts the Good Name of a Man more than a lack of fear of heaven.   To what does a lack of fear of heaven compare?   To irresponsible children who can not see the consequences of their actions.  The opposing Yatzirot within the human heart compares to the action of a piston within an internal combustion engine.   The movement of the piston produces horsepower and heat, in a similar vein so too does the conflict between the opposing Yatzirot within the heart.

        Practically speaking, the anointing of the House of Aaron as Moshiach arouses an equal and opposite חילול השם within the Yatzir Ha’Rah.  The two eldest sons of Aaron dedicated a strange fire … avodah zarah … and died when fire (ברית אש) descended from heaven.  These sons of Aaron, according to Midrashim, felt ambitious jealousy against both Moshe and Aaron.   The sages refer to this tumah nature as “evil eye”.   The revelation of the Torah in the presence of an “evil eye” results in death.   Goyim throughout history have imposed their “evil eye” upon stateless refugee Jewish populations and brought murder rape theft and oppression, which has defined the whole of church history, as exemplified through the specific Shoah war crimes, just in the last Century alone.

        The korban of purification/tohorah from tumah initiated the opening korban of the House of Aaron as Moshiach.   Thereafter Moshe offered the burnt offering, in the dedication of the House of Aaron as the Cohen Moshiach.  Then followed the korban of tohorah for the Nation of Cohonim, the House of Israel, together with their blessing\curse korban Oleh.

        Then followed the shalom korban.  Moshe and Aaron blessed the chosen Cohen nation and fire came and consumed the korbanot, and fear consumed their hearts like the fire burned the korbanot upon the altar.  Aaron’s two sons offered strange fire and died.  The anointing of the House of Aaron as the Moshiach, this event qualifies as a Yom Tov.  Hence Moshe commanded that Aaron and his house could not mourn during the 7 days of the Yom Tov Moshiach dedication.   Herein the sages learn that a person cannot mix mourning with joy during the Yom Tov seasons.  Let’s learn  

        A slightly distant precedent דברים ה: יב – ו: ט.  As HaShem set shabbot distinct and apart from the days of chol, so too HaShem has chosen the Cohen nation as t’rumah from the Goyim chol.   As shabbot stands apart from the days of chol, so too HaShem took Israel out of Egypt.

        The רמז of ברית אש contained within בראשית, clearly compares to the precedent of דברים ה: כג.  Moshe alone made aliyah upon the mount and received the revelation of the משנה תורה, the Oral Torah lives within the Written Torah.  Herein defines the k’vanna of the opening p’suk of the kre’a shma.

        Monotheism violates the 2nd Sinai revelation commandment.  HaShem judges between the two Yatzirot within our hearts, do we possess the fear of heaven to unify the Written and Oral Torah as ONE.   Israel demanded that Moshe receive the rest of the Torah.   Moshe commands all generations of Israel to learn the Written Torah based upon the logic of the Oral Torah system of precedents.   The Oral Torah logic sh’itta separates Israel from Goyim like Shabbot from chol.

        Compare that slightly distant precedent with this precise precedent: דברים ו: טז – ז: יא.  Consider the mussar which the p’suk ו: כד commands:  לעשות את כל החקים האלה ליראה etc.  חוקים require Oral Torah to grasp their mussar k’vanna.  The chosen Cohen nation has a Torah oath brit obligation to obey דברים ז: יא.

        Compare the kabbalah of the Books of שמואל, the prophet who anointed David Moshiach.  An exact precise precedent ז: ג – ח: כב.  When Israel stood in dread and terror before the Pelishtim, HaShem judged the Gods of these Goyim just as in the days of Moshe before Par’o and Yehoshua before the 33 kings of Canaan.

        The sons of the prophet Shmuel corrupted justice by accepting bribes.   Alas all comes from heaven except fear of heaven.  Therefore Israel broke faith that HaShem as the KING who brought Israel out of Egypt and HaShem as the KING who delivered Israel from the Pelishtim oppression.  Israel broke the oath brit tefillen faith cut with HaShem, and requested that the prophet anoint a Moshiach king.  Shmuel warned the nation that just as his sons lacked fear of heaven, this curse too would plague all the kings of Israel.

        A slightly distant precedent שמואל א יד: יט – טו: יט.  King Shaul when he defeated the Pelishtim forbade the people from eating.  This curse his son and heir profaned.   Upon this cracked יסוד built the House of Shaul the Moshiach mitzva.  The first altar king Shaul, the anointed Moshiach built, stood on the cracked יסוד of the people eating living blood – כרת!

        King Shaul, the Moshiach, made a vow.   Had he trusted the sages they could have annulled his vow.  But this fear of heaven king Shaul lacked, he thereafter violated his vow unto HaShem.  The oath brit faith cut at Gilgal, expressed through the Order of the Rashi tefillen, king Shaul broke faith with this oath brit, due to his fear of the People and their anger.

        King Shaul, the anointed Moshiach by the hand of Shmuel the prophet, next received a direct commandment to make total war against Amaleq.  This commandment the king failed to obey.  The result of king Shaul’s lack of fear of heaven – HaShem rejected his House as the king Moshiach.

        Compare the slightly distant precedent יז: לז – כ: יז with the precise precedent: כ: א – כג: ג.  David understood the oath brit cut at Gilgal, expressed through the Order of the Rashi tefillin; David revealed the dominance of the fear of heaven within his heart.  David fought the battle לשמה.  Contrast king Shaul and his “Evil Eye”. 

        Lust and jealousy define each and every false messiah from Shaul to JeZeus; from 8th Century Yudghanites who believed in reincarnation based primarily upon Jewish assimilation to the doctrines preached by Sufis.  From the 12th Century false messiah David Alroy (Menahem ben Solomon) who spawned the Menahemist movement to the post Ari mysticism which spawned Shabbetai Zevi.

        Mystic kabbalah developed since publication of the Zohar after the public burning of the Talmud in Paris, France in 1242 has plagued Yiddishkeit.  Perhaps the most notorious false messiah Shabbetai Zevi, followed up by the 18th Century false messiah who claimed himself as the reincarnation of Zevi – Jacov Joseph Frank.  The bane of the Zohar inspired mysticism, it has infected the minds of Jewry to this day.  Many followers of the Lubavitch Rebbe proclaim him as the moshiach; they say the Rebbe never died.

        The anointing of the moshiach mitzvah centers upon leadership during times of war.  None of the false messiahs, including Bar Kochba succeeded to defeat the enemy in war like as did David.

        Another slightly distant precedent כג: טז – כה: לא.  David with his “Good Eye” spared the life of Shaul in the cave.  Many of the false messiahs, together with their followers, have an ‘evil eye’, comparable to Doeg the Edomite,  by which they strive to destroy the Jewish people.  David the anointed Moshiach fought a conflict with Shaul expressed through a ‘Good Eye’ always toward the king.  Yet David rebuked the king with a strong mussar: 
        כד: יד.  יאמר משל הקדמני: מרשעים יצא רשע.

        The ‘evil eye’ of Naval, נבל שמו ונבלה עמו, serves as a precedent which defines all false messiahs.  All false messiahs, together with their followers lack fear of heaven.  All false messiahs, who conduct a conflict, seek to avenge themselves upon their enemies.  JeZeus slandered the P’rushim.  The Amidah tefillah comes from a straight kabbalah learned from the prophets.  Yet JeZeus praised the kneeling prayer made by a tax collecting thief. (Luke 18:10 – 14). 

        That false messiah acknowledged the P’rushim sat in the seat of Moshe. (Matt. 23:2).   He commanded his followers to do and keep the P’rushim Oral Torah.  Yet he refers to the forerunners of rabbinic Judaism as a ‘brood of vipers’.   The judges of the Great Sanhedrin qualify as leaders of the Cohen nation, as exemplified in the authority the Mishnah has upon the Jewish people to this very day.  The Torah commands a negative commandment not to curse the rulers of your people.

        Rabban Gamaliel (Acts 5:33 -39) counseled tolerance in the Sanhedrin when Peter and other apostles stood before the Court.  In (Acts 23: 6 – 9) A P’rushim judge argued for the defense of Paul against the Tzeddukim during a Sanhedrin court trial.

        Avot א:ג: Antigonus of Socho, a 2nd Century BCE tanna, his mussar instructs:  “Do not behave like slaves who serve their master in order to receive a reward.  Rather respect the slaves who do not serve their master in order to receive a reward.”  Derech Eretz Rabbah, one of the minor tractates of the Talmud, ב: יג understands the mussar taught by Socho as: עושין מאהבה, do good deed out of love.  Contrast the tumah ‘evil eye’ of (Matt. 23: 3) “They preach, but they do not practice.”

        The P’rushim focused upon tithes to Levi, charity to orphans, poor, and widows, tefillah, and fasting.  The so called sermon on the mount too praised similar middot.  Compare Acts 10:2,4, 22, 30.  The followers of that false messiah fraud refer to their new testament as: the word of God.  Their ‘evil eye’ refers to the Talmud as: words of Men.  Who in fact qualifies as hypocrites?  “By their fruits you shall know them”.

        Another precise precedent כו: ח – כח: יד.  The hypocrisy of the false messiah Shaul.  A slightly distant precedent שמואל ב יב: יג – טז: יג compared to the precise exact precedent of טו: כה – כא: ו.  The moshiach contrasts with the ‘evil eye’ practiced by רשעים.  David fasted while his son still lived.  Amnon lusted for the ערוה Tamar the sister of Avshalom, a brother from another mother.  The mussar of the prophet shines clear, the distinction between a ‘good’ vs. ‘evil’ eye separates the moshiach from all false messiahs.

        The mussar aggaddah concerning the story of Yoav and Ahitofel, again instructs a lesson touching an ‘evil eye’.  The matter of Mefivoshet too touches the distinction between a ‘good’ and ‘evil’ eye.  So too this identical mussar applies to the conflict between the men of Yechudah and the men of Israel.  In like manner Sheva, the son of Bikhri, of Benyamin.  In like manner the revenge ‘evil eye’ of the Giv’onim, who made public display and who refused to bury the 7 men from the house of Shaul whom they judged as guilty.
        Herein concludes the Oral Torah and prophetic mussar instruction wherein the generations learn the k’vanna of the Moshiach anointing of the house of Aaron and the death of his two sons.

        Like

  2. Yernasia Quorelios says:

    💜 Sex is Primarily Energetic Exchange EveryOne, the Ultimate Form of Joined Energy Being Horrible Little Brats, a New Life; so I AM so Grateful 🙏🏿 🥲 🙂 😊 🙌 ❤️ I AM Single and Childless EveryBody…that said; it Does Seem Most Parents Do Seem to Love ❤️ Their Horrible Little Brats aka Kids and Children; http://www.ericberne.com

    …💛💚💙…

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s